Fed. Cir.

Aviva Sports, Inc. v. Fingerhut Direct Marketing, No. 13-1635 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 18, 2014)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 13-1635
Decided: August 18, 2014
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

AVIVA SPORTS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant,

FINGERHUT DIRECT MARKETING, INC.,

MENARD, INC., AND KMART CORPORATION,

Defendants,

AND

MANLEY TOYS, LTD.,

doing business as Manley Toys, and

doing business as ToyQuest,

Defendant-Appellant.

2013-1635, -1671

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in No. 09-CV-1091, Judge Joan N. Ericksen.

JUDGMENT

STEPHEN M. LOBBIN, The Eclipse Group LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for defendant-appellant.

2J. THOMAS VITT, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for plaintiff-cross-appellant. With him on the brief were DAVID Y. TREVOR and MICHAEL WEINBECK. Of counsel was KEITH M. SORGE, Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak & Pikala, PA, of Minneapolis, Minnesota.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 18, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Aviva Sports, Inc. v. Fingerhut Direct Marketing, No. 13-1635 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 18, 2014).

govinfo ID: USCOURTS-ca13-13-01635-0
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01635-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error