Fed. Cir.

Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. applied Medical Resources, No. 13-1624 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 16, 2014)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 13-1624
Also Docketed: No. 14-1012 (consolidated; same document)
Decided: October 16, 2014
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit TYCO HEALTHCARE GROUP LP AND

UNITED STATES SURGICAL CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants,

APPLIED MEDICAL RESOURCES CORP.,

Defendant-Appellant. 2013-1624, 2014-1012

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 09-CV-0176, Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin.

JUDGMENT

J. MICHAEL JAKES, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-cross appellants. With him on the brief were KATHLEEN A. DALEY, of Washington, DC, and JACOB A. SCHROEDER, of Palo Alto, California.

JOSEPH R. RE, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were JOSEPH F. JENNINGS, SEAN M.

2MURRAY, MATTHEW S. BELLINGER, and STEPHEN W. LARSON.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PLAGER, and WALLACH, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 16, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. applied Medical Resources, No. 13-1624 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 16, 2014).

govinfo ID: USCOURTS-ca13-13-01624-0
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01624-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error