Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Multimedia Patent Trust v. apple Inc., No. 13-1620 (Fed. Cir. July 17, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1620
Decided
July 17, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MULTIMEDIA PATENT TRUST,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

APPLE INC., LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,

LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A., INC.,

AND LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.

Defendants-Appellees.

2013-1620

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 10-CV-2618, Judge Marilyn L. Huff.

JUDGMENT

KATHLEEN M. SULLIVAN, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With her on the brief were SANFORD I. WEISBURST; PHILIP C. STERNHELL, of Washington, DC; and FREDERICK A. LORIG, SUSAN R. ESTRICH, CHRISTOPHER A. MATHEWS, and BRUCE R. ZISSER, of Los Angeles, California.

2GREGORY A. CASTANIAS, Jones Day, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee Apple Inc. With him on the brief were JENNIFER L. SWIZE; WILLIAM C. ROOKLIDGE, of Irvine California; and MARRON A. MAHONEY, of Chicago, Illinois.

JUSTIN BARNES, Fish & Richardson P.C., of San Diego, California, argued for defendants-appellees LG Electronics, Inc., et al. With him on the brief were LARA S. GARNER; MICHAEL J. MCKEON, of Washington, DC; and FRANK P. PORCELLI, of Boston, Massachusetts. Of counsel were FRANCIS J. ALBERT, and JUANITA ROSE BROOKS, of San Diego, California; RICHARD ALEX STERBA, of Washington, DC; and KELLY CATHERINE HUNSAKER, of Redwood City, California.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 17, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Multimedia Patent Trust v. apple Inc., No. 13-1620 (Fed. Cir. July 17, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-13-01620-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01620-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.