Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Alzheimer's Institute v. avid Radiopharmaceuticals, No. 13-1544 (Fed. Cir. May 16, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1544
Decided
May 16, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ALZHEIMERS INSTITUTE OF AMERICA, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

AVID RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS,

Defendant-Appellee,

AND

THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF

PENNSYLVANIA,

Defendant-Appellee,

AND

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA BOARD OF

TRUSTEES,

Defendant-Appellee.

2013-1544

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in No. 10-CV-6908, Judge Timothy J. Savage.

JUDGMENT

2K. LEE MARSHALL, Bryan Cave LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were BERRIE R. GOLDMAN; J. BENNETT CLARK and AMEER GADO, of St. Louis, Missouri.

CHARLES E. LIPSEY, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, of Reston, Virginia, argued for all defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were L. SCOTT BURWELL; ROBERT D. BAJEFSKY, LAURA P. MASUROVSKY, and DANIELLE A. DUSZCZYSZYN, of Washington, DC. Of counsel on the brief were STEVEN P. CALTRIDER and MANISHA A. DESAI, Eli Lilly and Company, of Indianapolis, Indiana for Avid Radiopharmaceuticals; JOESPH LUCCI and JORDAN J. OLIVER, Baker & Hostetler, LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania; and JERRY STOUCK, Greenberg Traurig LLP, of Washington, DC, for University of South Florida Board of Trustees.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 16, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Alzheimer's Institute v. avid Radiopharmaceuticals, No. 13-1544 (Fed. Cir. May 16, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-13-01544-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01544-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.