Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Compression Technology v. EMC Corporation, No. 13-1513 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 10, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1513
Decided
March 10, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit COMPRESSION TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

EMC CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee,

AND

NETAPP, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

AND

QUANTUM CORP.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2013-1513

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 12-CV-1746, Senior Judge Ronald M. Whyte.

JUDGMENT

2PAUL A. LESKO, Simmons Browder Gianaris Angelides & Barnerd, LLC, of Alton, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was SARAH S. BURNS.

CLEMENT S. ROBERTS, Durie Tangri, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for all defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were MARK A. LEMLEY, Durie Tangri LLP, for Quantum Corporation; JESSE J. JENNER and KHUE V. HOANG, Ropes & Gray, LLP, of New York, New York, for EMC Corporation; and GREGORY S. BISHOP and THOMAS F. FITZPATRICK, Pepper Hamilton, LLP, of Redwood City, California, and DOUGLAS B. LUFTMAN, Netapp, Inc., of Sunnyvale, California, for NetApp, Inc. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 10, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Compression Technology v. EMC Corporation, No. 13-1513 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 10, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-13-01513-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01513-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.