Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. v. First Quality Baby Products, No. 13-1493 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 10, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1493
Decided
October 10, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC. AND

KIMBERLY-CLARK GLOBAL SALES, LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

FIRST QUALITY BABY PRODUCTS, LLC,

FIRST QUALITY RETAIL SERVICES, LLC, AND

FIRST QUALITY CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees.

2013-1493, -1494

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin in Nos. 09-CV-0916 and 10-CV-1118, Judge William C. Griesbach.

JUDGMENT

CONSTANTINE L. TRELA, JR., Sidley Austin LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were RYAN C. MORRIS and JEREMY M. BYLUND, of Washington, DC. Of counsel on the brief were MARC S. COOPERMAN, J. PIETER VAN ES, and MATTHEW P. BECKER, Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., of Chicago, Illinois, and

2ANTHONY SCOTT BAISH, Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., of Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

KENNETH P. GEORGE, Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were BRIAN A. COMACK and MARK BERKOWITZ. Of counsel on the brief were D. MICHAEL UNDERHILL, MICHAEL A. BRILLE, and RICHARD S. MEYER, Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, of Washington, DC. Of counsel was NEAL CURTIS HANNAN.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

DYK, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 10, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. v. First Quality Baby Products, No. 13-1493 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 10, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-13-01493-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01493-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.