Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Operating Systems Solutions v. apple Inc., No. 13-1487 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 18, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1487
Decided
March 18, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit OPERATING SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

APPLE INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2013-1487

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida in No. 11-CV-1754, Judge James S. Moody, Jr.

JUDGMENT

BRYAN GUY HARRISON, Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was JEFFREY THOMAS BRELOSKI.

DEANNE E. MAYNARD, Morrison & Foerster LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief were BRIAN R. MATSUI, and NATALIE R. RAM. Of counsel on the brief were JAMES R. BATCHELDER, Ropes & Gray, LLP, of East Palo Alto, California, and CHING-LEE FUKUDA and KEVIN J. POST, of New York, New

2York. Of counsel was DOUGLAS HALLWARD-DRIEMEIER, of Morrison & Foerster, LLP, of Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 18, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Operating Systems Solutions v. apple Inc., No. 13-1487 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 18, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-13-01487-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01487-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.