Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

01 Communique Laboratory v. Logmein, Inc., No. 13-1479 (Fed. Cir. June 9, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1479
Also Docketed
No. 13-1525 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
June 9, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

01 COMMUNIQUE LABORATORY, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

LOGMEIN, INC.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant.

2013-1479, -1525

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 10-CV-1007, Senior Judge Claude M. Hilton.

JUDGMENT

THOMAS H. SHUNK, Baker & Hostetler LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were JOHN P. CORRADO, KENNETH J. SHEEHAN, A. NEAL SETH, and CHARLES C. CARSON, of Washington, DC.

MARK C. FLEMING, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief were WAYNE L. STONER, VINITA FERRERA and DANA O. BURWELL; and ARTHUR W. COVIELLO, of Palo Alto, California.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: ∗

MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 9, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Footnotes

  1. ∗ Sharon Prost assumed the position of Chief Judge on May 31, 2014.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

01 Communique Laboratory v. Logmein, Inc., No. 13-1479 (Fed. Cir. June 9, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-13-01479-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01479-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.