Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Rydex, Ltd. v. Ford Motor Company, No. 13-1462 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 18, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1462
Decided
February 18, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

RYDEX, LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY,

MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC.

(DOING BUSINESS AS MAZDA NORTH AMERICAN

OPERATIONS),

Defendants-Cross Appellants

TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant

NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant

AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.,

SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants

2013-1462, 2013-1463

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas in No. 11-CV-0122, Judge Vanessa D. Gilmore.

2JUDGMENT

STAMATIOS STAMOULIS, Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC, Wilmington, DE, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

DOMINIC FRANCIS PERELLA, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-cross appellants. Also represented by JASON R. MUDD, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS. JEFFREY SCOTT PATTERSON, Hartline Dacus Barger Dreyer LLP, Dallas, TX, for defendant-cross appellant Nissan North America, Inc. ERIC W. SCHWEIBENZ, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, Alexandria, VA, for plaintiff-cross appellant Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. Also represented by RICHARD D. KELLY, ROBERT CARTER MATTSON.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 18, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Rydex, Ltd. v. Ford Motor Company, No. 13-1462 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 18, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-13-01462-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01462-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.