Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Power Management Solutions v. advanced Micro Devices, No. 13-1455 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 14, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1455
Also Docketed
No. 13-1456, No. 13-1457 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
January 14, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
3 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

POWER MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2013-1455

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 12-CV-0426, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -POWER MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

NVIDIA CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

2013-1456

2Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 12-CV-0427, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -POWER MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

INTEL CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee,

AND

TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellee,

AND

MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2013-1457

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 11-CV-0743, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

JUDGMENT

BRYAN GUY HARRISON, Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was JEFFREY THOMAS BRELOSKI.

3DAVID C. MARCUS, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for all defendants-appellees. With him on the brief for defendant-appellee Intel Corporation were MARK C. FLEMING, LOUIS W. TOMPROS, and KEVIN A. GOLDMAN, of Boston, Massachusetts; and ARTHUR W. COVIELLO, of Palo Alto, California. On the brief for defendant-appellee Texas Instruments Incorporated was THOMAS R. JACKSON, Jones Day, of Dallas, Texas. Of counsel was DANIEL T. CONRAD. On the brief for defendant-appellee Marvell Semiconductor, Inc., was MICHAEL A. MOLANO, Mayer Brown, LLP, of Palo Alto, California.

AARON R. FAHRENKROG, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, for defendant-appellee Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

MICHAEL G. RHODES, Cooley LLP, of San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee NVIDIA Corporation. With him on the brief were BENJAMIN G. DAMSTEDT and LAM K. NGUYEN, of Palo Alto, California.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 14, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Power Management Solutions v. advanced Micro Devices, No. 13-1455 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 14, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-13-01455-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01455-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.