Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers, No. 13-1180 (Fed. Cir. July 10, 2014)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1180
Decided
July 10, 2014
Judge
Document
Errata
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

August 27, 2014

ERRATA

Appeal No. 2013-1180

RAYMOND E. STAUFFER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BROOKS BROTHERS GROUP, INC., formerly known as Retail Brand Alliance, Inc.,

formerly known as Brooks Brothers, Inc.,

Defendant-Appellee,

AND

UNITED STATES,

Intervenor-Appellee.

Decided: July 10, 2014

Precedential Opinion

Please make the following changes: Page 13, in the second paragraph in Section IV, delete the phrase “, and that the case should be reassigned to a different judge on remand.”

2Page 14, in a new paragraph after the last full paragraph in Section IV, add the sentence “Mr. Stauffer also argues that the case should be reassigned to a different judge on remand, but that issue is now moot.”

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers, No. 13-1180 (Fed. Cir. July 10, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-13-01180-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01180-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.