Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Sinclair-Allison, Inc. v. Fifth avenue Physician Service, No. 13-1177 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 12, 2013)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1177
Decided
September 12, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SINCLAIR-ALLISON, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

FIFTH AVENUE PHYSICIAN SERVICES, LLC,

FIFTH AVENUE AGENCY, INC., PRIMORIS

CREDENTIALING NETWORK, AND PROFILE

VERIFICATION SERVICES,

Defendants-Appellees.

2013-1177

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma in No. 12-CV-0360, Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange.

JUDGMENT

NATHANIEL B. WEBB, Sinclair-Allison, Inc., of Akron, Ohio, argued for the plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was DANIEL A. THOMSON.

JOHN A. KENNEY, McAfee & Taft, of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, argued for defendants-appellees.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, DYK, and TARANTO,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 12, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole

Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Sinclair-Allison, Inc. v. Fifth avenue Physician Service, No. 13-1177 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 12, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-13-01177-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01177-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error