Fed. Cir.

Smart Options, LLC v. Jump Rope, Inc., No. 13-1116 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 16, 2014)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 13-1116
Also Docketed: No. 13-1218 (consolidated; same document)
Decided: April 16, 2014
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SMART OPTIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

JUMP ROPE, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2013-1116, -1218

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in No. 12-CV-2498, Judge Amy J. St. Eve.

JUDGMENT

GEOFFREY ANDREW BAKER, Smart Options, LLC, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

TODD H. FLAMING, KrausFlaming, LLC, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

2PER CURIAM (LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and CHEN, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 16, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Smart Options, LLC v. Jump Rope, Inc., No. 13-1116 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 16, 2014).

govinfo ID: USCOURTS-ca13-13-01116-0
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01116-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error