Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Versata Software, Inc. v. Internet Brands, Inc., No. 13-1074 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 17, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1074
Decided
January 17, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

VERSATA SOFTWARE, INC., (formerly known as

Trilogy Software, Inc.) AND VERSATA

DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC., (formerly known as

Trilogy Development Group, Inc.),

Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants,

v.

INTERNET BRANDS, INC., (formerly known as Carsdirect.com, Inc.), CARDIRECT.COM. INC.,

AUTODATA SOLUTIONS COMPANY, AND

AUTODATA SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants.

2013-1074, -1075

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 08-CV-0313, Circuit Judge William C. Bryson.

JUDGMENT

SCOTT L. COLE, McKool Smith, P.C., of Austin, Texas, argued for plaintiffs-cross-appellants. With him on the brief were JOEL L. THOLLANDER and LEAH B. BURATTI.

2MICHAEL P. ADAMS, Jackson Walker L.L.P., of Austin, Texas, argued for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief were JAMES RUIZ, ANDREW J. SCHUMACHER, BRIAN KING and JEFFREY A. TINKER, Winstead PC, of Austin, Texas.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 17, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Versata Software, Inc. v. Internet Brands, Inc., No. 13-1074 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 17, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-13-01074-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01074-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.