Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Federal Home Loan v. Graff/Ross Holdings, No. 13-1067 (Fed. Cir. May 15, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1067
Also Docketed
No. 13-1068, No. 13-1069 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
May 15, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE

CORPORATION, AKA FREDDIE MAC,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GRAFF/ROSS HOLDINGS, LLP,

Defendant-Appellant

2013-1067, 2013-1068, 2013-1069

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in Nos. 07-CV-0796, 10-CV-1948, 11-CV-0941, Judge Richard J. Leon.

JUDGMENT

MATTHEW J. MOORE, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by ADAM MICHAEL GREENFIELD, GABRIEL BELL.

JONATHAN S. FRANKLIN, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant.

2Also represented by SHEILA C. KADURA, MARK T. GARRETT, Austin, TX; BRETT CHRISTOPHER GOVETT, Dallas, TX. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, REYNA, and TARANTO, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Federal Home Loan v. Graff/Ross Holdings, No. 13-1067 (Fed. Cir. May 15, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-13-01067-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01067-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error