Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Randall asher v. Colgate-Palmolive Company, No. 13-1043 (Fed. Cir. May 29, 2013)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1043
Decided
May 29, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

RANDALL S. ASHER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

2013-1043

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado in No. 10-CV-1468, Judge Marcia S. Krieger.

JUDGMENT

WILLIAM W. COCHRAN, II, Cochran Freund & Yong, of Fort Collins, Colorado and GORDON M. HADFIELD, Fischer & Fischer, LLP, of Fort Collins, Colorado, argued for plaintiff-appellant. On the brief was ERIK G. FISCHER, Erik G. Fischer, P.C., of Fort Collins, Colorado.

DAVID K. CALLAHAN, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was JARED BARCENAS.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PLAGER, and O’MALLEY, Cir-

cuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 29, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Randall asher v. Colgate-Palmolive Company, No. 13-1043 (Fed. Cir. May 29, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-13-01043-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01043-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error