Fed. Cir.

Norotos, Inc. v. Ops-Core, Inc., No. 13-1042 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 9, 2013)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 13-1042
Decided: April 9, 2013
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

NOROTOS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

OPS-CORE, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2013-1042

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in No. 09-CV-10215, Judge Richard G. Stearns.

JUDGMENT

EDWARD R. SCHWARTZ, Christie, Parker & Hale LLP, of Glendale, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was THOMAS J. DALY.

THOMAS B. KENWORTHY, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for defendant-appellee.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 9, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Norotos, Inc. v. Ops-Core, Inc., No. 13-1042 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 9, 2013).

govinfo ID: USCOURTS-ca13-13-01042-0
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01042-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error