Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

AIA Engineering Ltd. v. Magotteaux International, No. 13-1035 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 13, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1035
Decided
September 13, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

AIA ENGINEERING LIMITED,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,

AND

VEGA INDUSTRIES, LTD., INC.,

Third Party Defendant-Appellant,

v.

MAGOTTEAUX INTERNATIONAL S/A,

AND MAGOTTEAUX, INC.,

Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellees.

2013-1035

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee in No. 09-CV-0255, Chief Judge William Joseph Haynes, Jr.

JUDGMENT

PAUL C. NEY, JR., Waddey & Patterson, P.C., of Nashville, Tennessee, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim defend-

2ant-appellant and third party defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were EDWARD D. LANQUIST, JR. and MATTHEW C. COX.

JAMES M. BOLLINGER, Troutman Sanders LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendants/counterclaimants-appellees. With him on the brief were TIMOTHY P. HEATON; JOHN J. GRESENS and SCOTT D. BARNETT, of Chicago, Illinois; and PUJA R. PATEL, of Atlanta, Georgia. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 13, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

AIA Engineering Ltd. v. Magotteaux International, No. 13-1035 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 13, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-13-01035-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01035-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.