Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Markem-Imaje Corporation v. Zipher Ltd., No. 13-1032 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 25, 2013)

Dismissed
General / Procedural
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1032
Decided
March 25, 2013
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit MARKEM-IMAJE CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

ZIPHER LTD. AND VIDEOJET TECHNOLOGIES,

INC.,

Defendants-Appellants.

2013-1032

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire in No. 07-CV-0006, Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.

Decided: March 25, 2013 KARA F. STOLL, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP., of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. With her on the brief was GARTH D. BAER.

Before NEWMAN, LINN, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.

22 MARKEM-IMAJE CORPORATION v. ZIPHER LTD.

PER CURIAM.

Subsequent to the district court’s final judgment the parties agreed to a settlement that leaves no “legitimate, continuing case or controversy.” Allflex USA, Inc. v. Avid Identification Sys., Inc., 704 F.3d 1362, 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2013). Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed.

DISMISSED

No costs.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Markem-Imaje Corporation v. Zipher Ltd., No. 13-1032 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 25, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-13-01032-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01032-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error