Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Deep9 Corp. v. Barnes & Noble, No. 13-1031 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1031
Decided
May 13, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

DEEP9 CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BARNES & NOBLE, INC., AND

BARNESANDNOBLE.COM, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees.

2013-1031

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in No. 11-CV-0035, Judge James L. Robart.

JUDGMENT

CHRISTIAN E. MAMMEN, Hogan Lovells US, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel on the brief were ERIC B. FASTIFF and DAVID T. RUDOLPH, Lieff, Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, of San Francisco, California; and KIM D. STEPHENS and CHASE ALVORD, Tousley Brain Stephens, PLLC, of Seattle, Washington.

2JOHN B. QUINN, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for defendants-appellees. Of counsel on the brief were DAVID EISEMAN and JEFFREY S. GERCHICK, of Washington, DC; and MELISSA J. BAILY, of San Francisco, California.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 13, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Deep9 Corp. v. Barnes & Noble, No. 13-1031 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-13-01031-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01031-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.