Fed. Cir.

T.F.H. Publications v. Doskocil Manufacturing Co., No. 13-1030 (Fed. Cir. June 5, 2013)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 13-1030
Decided: June 5, 2013
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

T.F.H. PUBLICATIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

DOSKOCIL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2013-1030

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in No. 08-CV-4805, Judge Freda L. Wolfson.

JUDGMENT

RUSSELL S. BURNSIDE, Greenberg, Dauber, Epstein & Tucker, P.C., of Newark, New Jersey, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

GREGORY S. TAMKIN, Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, of Denver, Colorado, argued for defendant-appellee. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

2PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and WALLACH, Circuit

Judge).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 5, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

T.F.H. Publications v. Doskocil Manufacturing Co., No. 13-1030 (Fed. Cir. June 5, 2013).

govinfo ID: USCOURTS-ca13-13-01030-0
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01030-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error