Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation, No. 13-1009 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 10, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1009
Decided
April 10, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

KILOPASS TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SIDENSE CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

2013-1009

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 10-CV-2066, Judge Susan Y. Illston.

JUDGMENT

MARK L. HOGGE, SNR Denton US, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were SHAILENDRA K. MAHESHWARI, RACHEL REPKA, KHALIQ A. IMRAN and ANDREW BLAIR. Of counsel was JAMES A. KLENK.

ROGER L. COOK, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were ROBERT D. TADLOCK and SARA B. GIARDINA. Of counsel was JOSHUA HAMILTON LEE, of Atlanta, Georgia.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges.).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 10, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation, No. 13-1009 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 10, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-13-01009-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01009-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.