Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Bayer CropScience AG v. Dow AgroSciences LLC, No. 13-1002 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 3, 2013)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1002
Decided
September 3, 2013
Judge
Document
Errata
Length
1 page

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

September 3, 2013 ERRATA

Appeal No. 2013-1002 BAYER CROPSCIENCE AG, Plantiff-Appellant,

v.

DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Decided: September 3, 2013 Precedential Opinion

Please make the following change: Page 1, “Mark S. Davis” to “Mark S. Davies”.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Bayer CropScience AG v. Dow AgroSciences LLC, No. 13-1002 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 3, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-13-01002-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01002-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.