Greenville Communications v. Cellco Partnership, No. 12-1676 (Fed. Cir. May 17, 2013)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

GREENVILLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP,

(doing business as Verizon Wireless)

AND ALLTEL CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees,

AND

T-MOBILE USA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

AND

AT&T MOBILITY LLC,

(doing business as Cingular Wireless),

Defendant-Appellee,

AND

SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P., AND NEXTEL

OPERATIONS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

2012-1676

2Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in No. 07-CV-4222, Judge Mary L. Cooper.

JUDGMENT

JOHN F. WARD, Ward & Zinna, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was MICHAEL J. ZINNA. Of counsel on the brief were ERIC ALAN ISAACSON, REGIS C. WORLEY, JR., and CODY R. LEJEUNE, Robbins Geller Rudman & Down LLP, of San Diego, California.

DOUGLAS M. KUBEHL, Baker Botts, L.L.P., of Dallas, Texas, argued for all defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were SAMARA KLINE and CHRISTA BROWNSANFORD; and RICHARD H. BROWN, III, Day Pitney, LLP, of Parsippany, New Jersey for defendant-appellee AT&T Mobility, LLC; and KATHRYN L. CLUNE and CLYDE E. FINDLEY, Crowell & Moring, LLP, of Washington, DC, and KAREN A. CONFOY, Sterns & Weinroth, P.C., of Trenton, New Jersey, for Defendants-appellees, Sprint Spectrum L.P., et al.; JOHN CHRISTOPHER ROZENDAAL and MICHAEL E. JOFFRE, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C., of Washington, DC, and JAMES P. FLYNN, Epstein Becker & Green, of Newark, New Jersey, for defendants-appellees, Cellco Partnership, et al.; ROBERT HARKINS, Sedgwick LLP, of San Francisco, California, KIRK R. RUTHENBERG, SNR Denton, US, LLP, of Washington, DC, and ARNOLD B. CALMANN, Saiber, LLC, of Newark, New Jersey, for defendant-appellee T-Mobile, USA, Inc.

3THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: