NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
CORDIS CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION AND
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
2012-1647
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 10-CV-0039, Judge Sue L. Robinson.
Decided: May 13, 2013
CONSTANTINE L. TRELA, JR., Sidley Austin, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were DAVID T. PRITIKIN, WILLIAM H. BAUMGARTNER, JR., and ANTHONY BALKISSOON. Of counsel was LINDA R. FRIEDLIEB.
MATTHEW M. WOLF, Arnold & Porter LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on
22 CORDIS CORP. v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. the brief were EDWARD HAN, JOHN E. NILSSON and SETH I. HELLER.
Before O'MALLEY, SCHALL, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.
We affirm the judgment of the district court without opinion. We vacate, however, the portion of the district court’s decision “nullifying” (invalidating) dependent claims 14–16 of U.S. Patent No. 6,547,817. See Cordis Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp., 868 F. Supp. 2d 342, 356-57 (D. Del. 2012).