Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

IA Labs CA, LLC v. Nintendo Co., Ltd., No. 12-1644 (Fed. Cir. June 18, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1644
Decided
June 18, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IA LABS CA, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

NINTENDO CO., LTD., AND NINTENDO OF

AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

2012-1644

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland in No. 10-CV-0833, Judge Peter J. Messitte.

JUDGMENT

ANDREW DINOVO, DiNovo Price Ellwanger & Hardy LLP, of Austin, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were ADAM G. PRICE, JAY D. ELLWANGER, NICOLE E. GLAUSER and STAFANIE T. SCOTT.

JERRY A. RIEDINGER, Perkins Coie LLP, of Seattle, Washington, argued for defendants-appellees. With him

2on the brief were TYLER C. PETERSON and KIRSTIN E. LARSON; and C. MARK KITTREDGE, of Phoenix, Arizona. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judge).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 18, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

IA Labs CA, LLC v. Nintendo Co., Ltd., No. 12-1644 (Fed. Cir. June 18, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-12-01644-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-12-01644-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.