Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Pixion, Inc. v. Citrix Systems, Inc., No. 12-1636 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 19, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1636
Decided
March 19, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

PIXION, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., AND CITRIX ONLINE,

LLC,

Defendants-Appellees.

2012-1636

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 09-CV-3496, Judge Susan Y. Illston.

JUDGMENT

COLBY B. SPRINGER, Lewis and Roca, LLP, of Mountain View California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel was SHANE E. OLAFSON, of Phoenix, Arizona. BLAIR M. JACOBS, McDermott Will & Emery, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were SARAH CHAPIN COLUMBIA and LEIGH J. MARTINSON, of Boston, Massachusetts. Of counsel on the brief was TERRY W. AHEARN, of Menlo Park, California. Of counsel was BRYAN KEITH JAMES, of Menlo Park, California.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 19, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Pixion, Inc. v. Citrix Systems, Inc., No. 12-1636 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 19, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-12-01636-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-12-01636-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.