Eolas Technologies v. amazon.com, Inc., No. 12-1632 (Fed. Cir. July 22, 2013)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF

CALIFORNIA,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

AMAZON.COM, INC., AND YAHOO! INC.,

Defendants-Appellees,

AND

GOOGLE INC., AND YOUTUBE, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees,

AND

J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2012-1632

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 09-CV-0446, Chief Judge Leonard Davis.

2JUDGMENT

MIKE MCKOOL JR., McKool Smith, P.C., of Dallas, Texas, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were DOUGLAS A. CAWLEY, of Dallas, Texas, and KEVIN L. BURGESS, JOHN B. CAMPBELL and JOEL L. THOLLANDER, of Austin, Texas.

DARYL L. JOSEFFER, King & Spalding LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was ADAM CONRAD, for all defendants-appellees. Of counsel on the brief were DOUGLAS E. LUMISH, Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP, of Redwood Shores, California, for defendants-appellees, Google Inc., et al.; DIANE K. LETTELLEIR, J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., Plano, Texas, for defendant-appellee for J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.; EDWARD R. REINES, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, of Redwood Shores, California, and JENNIFER H. DOAN, Haltom & Doan, of Texarkana, Texas, for defendants-appellees Amazon.com, Inc., et al.; KEVIN T. KRAMER, Yahoo! Inc., of Sunnyvale, California, for defendant-appellee, Yahoo! Inc.; and JEFFREY H. DEAN, Amazon.com, Inc., of Seattle, Washington, for defendant-appellee, Amazon.com, Inc.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: