Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Global Communications v. PDI Communications, No. 12-1619 (Fed. Cir. May 8, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1619
Decided
May 8, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

PDI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

NORTH AMERICAN CABLE EQUIPMENT, INC.,

PERFECTVISION MANUFACTURING, INC.,

AND DSI SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

2012-1619

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida in No. 11-CV-0541, Judge Robert L. Hinkle.

JUDGMENT

GUY M. BURNS, Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP, of Tampa, Florida, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was JONATHAN S. COLEMAN. Of counsel on the brief was J. WILEY HORTON, Pennington, Moore, Wilkinson, Bell & Dunbar, P.A., of Tallahassee, Florida.

2GREGORY A. CASTANIAS, Jones Day, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was JENNIFER L. SWIZE; LOUIS TOUTON, of Los Angeles, California.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 8, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Global Communications v. PDI Communications, No. 12-1619 (Fed. Cir. May 8, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-12-01619-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-12-01619-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.