Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Teva Women's Health, Inc. v. Lupin, Ltd., No. 12-1577 (Fed. Cir. May 21, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1577
Decided
May 21, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

TEVA WOMEN'S HEALTH, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

LUPIN, LTD., AND

LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees,

AND

MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., MYLAN INC.,

AND FAMY CARE LTD.,

Defendants-Appellees.

2012-1577

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Nos. 10-CV-0603 and 10-CV-1235, Judge Peter G. Sheridan.

JUDGMENT

RICHARD C. PETTUS, Greenberg Traurig LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him

2on the brief was CHARANJIT BRAHMA, of Washington, DC. Of counsel were VERA RANIERI, and NICHOLAS A. BROWN of San Francisco, California; and JACK LIN of Washington, DC.

TIMOTHY H. KRATZ, McGuire Woods LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were ROBERT L. FLORENCE and GEORGE J. BARRY, III. Of counsel on the brief were ARNOLD B. CALMANN, Saiber LLC, of Newark, New Jersey; SAILESH K. PATEL, Schiff Hardin LLP, of Chicago, Illinois; D. CHRISTOPHER OHLY, of Washington, DC; GEORGE C. YU and ALISON L. MADDEFORD, of San Francisco, California; HENRY P. BEHNEN, of New York, New York; and KAREN A. CONFOY and ERICA S. HELMS, Sterns & Weinroth, P.C., of Trenton, New Jersey.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 21, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Teva Women's Health, Inc. v. Lupin, Ltd., No. 12-1577 (Fed. Cir. May 21, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-12-01577-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-12-01577-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.