Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Tahir Mahmood v. Research in Motion, No. 12-1517 (Fed. Cir. June 18, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1517
Also Docketed
No. 13-1062 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
June 18, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

TAHIR MAHMOOD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

RESEARCH IN MOTION, LTD.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2012-1517

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 11-CV-5345, Judge Katherine B. Forrest.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

TAHIR MAHMOOD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

RESEARCH IN MOTION, LTD.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2013-1062

2Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 12-CV-0899, Judge Katherine B. Forrest.

JUDGMENT

RONALD M. DAIGNAULT, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, L.L.P., of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were RONALD J. SCHUTZ, DAVID LEICHTMAN and ANNIE HUANG.

PAUL B. KELLER, Allen & Overy, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were MICHAEL S. FELDBERG and LAURA R. HALL. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judge).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 18, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Tahir Mahmood v. Research in Motion, No. 12-1517 (Fed. Cir. June 18, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-12-01517-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-12-01517-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.