Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

eBay Inc. v. Kelora Systems, LLC, No. 12-1474 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 19, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1474
Decided
March 19, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
3 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

EBAY INC. AND MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

AND

CABELAS INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

KELORA SYSTEMS, LLC,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

KELORA SYSTEMS, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

TARGET CORPORATION, AMAZON.COM, INC., OFFICE DEPOT,INC., COSTCO WHOLESALE

CORPORATION, HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,

AUDIBLE, INC., AND ZAPPOS.COM, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees,

AND

DELL, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

AND

NEWEGG INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

22012-1474, -1475, -1476

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 11-CV-1548, Judge Claudia Wilken.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT D. BECKER, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, of Palo Alto, California, argued for the defendant-appellant, Kelora Systems, LLC. With him on the brief were RONALD S. KATZ and SHAWN G. HANSEN. CONSTANTINE L. TRELA, JR., Sidley Austin, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for all plaintiffs-appellees and defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were RICHARD A. CEDEROTH and THEODORE W. CHANDLER, of Los Angeles, California, for defendants-appellees, eBay, Inc. et al. Also on the brief were GREGORY P. SITRICK, Quarles & Brady LLP, of Phoenix, Arizona; CHRISTOPHER J. FAHY, of Chicago, Illinois; JEFFREY L. FILLERUP, McKenna Long & Aldridge, LLP, of San Francisco, California, for defendants-appellees, Cabela’s Inc.; JONATHAN S. FRANKLIN, Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P., of Washington, DC; DAN D. DAVISON, of Dallas, Texas; RICHARD S. ZEMBEK and DANIEL S. LEVENTHAL, of Houston, Texas; GILBERT A. GREENE and SHEILA KADURA, of Austin, Texas, for defendants-appellees, Target, et al.; JOSEPH A. MICALLEF and SCOTT M. BORDER, Sidley Austin, LLP, of Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee, Dell, Inc.; KIMBALL R. ANDERSON and KATHLEEN B. BARRY, of Winston & Strawn LLP, of Chicago, Illinois; KENT E. BALDAUF, JR., BRYAN P. CLARK and DANIEL H. BREAN, The Webb Law Firm, of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for defendant-appellee, Newegg.

3THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

es).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 19, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

eBay Inc. v. Kelora Systems, LLC, No. 12-1474 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 19, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-12-01474-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-12-01474-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.