Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

CBT Flint Partners, LLC v. Return Path, Inc., No. 12-1460 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1460
Also Docketed
No. 12-1594 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
April 11, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CBT FLINT PARTNERS, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

RETURN PATH, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

AND

CISCO IRONPORT SYSTEMS, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees.

2012-1460,-1594

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in No. 07-CV-1822, Judge Thomas W. Thrash Jr.

JUDGMENT

DARYL L. JOSEFFER, King & Spalding, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were ADAM M. CONRAD; BRUCE W. BABER,

2NATASHA H. MOFFITT and RUSSELL E. BLYTHE, of Atlanta, Georgia.

MATTHEW C. GAUDET, Duane Morris, LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were L. NORWOOD JAMESON and JOHN R. GIBSON. Of counsel on the brief was KENNETH L. BRESSLER, Blank Rome, LLP, of New York, New York.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 11, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

CBT Flint Partners, LLC v. Return Path, Inc., No. 12-1460 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-12-01460-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-12-01460-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.