Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Digitech Information Systems v. BMW auto Leasing, No. 12-1414 (Fed. Cir. May 10, 2013)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1414
Decided
May 10, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit DIGITECH INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BMW AUTO LEASING, LLC, AND BMW FINANCIAL

SERVICES NA, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees.

2012-1414

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida in No. 10-CV-1373, Judge John Antoon, II.

JUDGMENT

NORMAN H. ZIVIN, Cooper & Dunham LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was HINDY DYM.

JOSEPH P. LAVELLE, DLA Piper LLP (US), of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Of counsel was ANDREW N. STEIN.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, MOORE, Circuit

Judge and BENSON. District Judge.* AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 10, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Footnotes

  1. * Honorable Dee V. Benson, District Judge, United States District of Utah, sitting by designation.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Digitech Information Systems v. BMW auto Leasing, No. 12-1414 (Fed. Cir. May 10, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-12-01414-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-12-01414-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error