Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Source Vagabond Systems Ltd. v. Hydrapak, Inc., No. 12-1408 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 11, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1408
Decided
January 11, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. mutteb ~tate5 ({onrt of ~peaI5

for tbe jfeberaI ({trentt SOURCE VAGABOND SYSTEMS LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

HYDRAPAK, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2012-1408

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (New York City) in No. 11 CV-5379, Judge Colleen McMahon.

JUDGMENT

GUY YONAY, Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

ERIC S. WALTERS, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was BENJAMIN J. BYER.

2THIS CAUSE HAVING BEEN HEARD AND CONSIDERED, IT IS

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

Figure on page 1 of the opinion
Figure on page 2 of the opinion

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 11, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

FILE!) U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE ~~f"~R'il C,r;-~:

jr\" JAN 1 'I l013

JAN HORBAL~

CLERK

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Source Vagabond Systems Ltd. v. Hydrapak, Inc., No. 12-1408 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 11, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-12-01408-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-12-01408-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.