Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Biax Corporation v. Nvidia Corporation, No. 12-1387 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 8, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1387
Decided
February 8, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

BIAX CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

NVIDIA CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

AND

SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA,

INC., AND SONY ELECTRONICS INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

2012-1387

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado in No. 09-CV-1257, Judge Philip A. Brimmer.

JUDGMENT

2STEVEN J. MERKER, Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, of Denver, Colorado, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

MARK S. DAVIES, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, of Washington, DC argued for defendant-appellee, Nvidia Corporation and DAVID ROKACH, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendants-appellees, Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc., et al. With them on the brief were CHRIS R. OTTENWELLER, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, ALEX V. CHACHKES, of New York, New York, DONALD DAYBELL and CHRISTINA VON DER AHE, of Irvine, California for defendant-appellee, Nvidia Corporation. Also on the brief was CHRISTIAN CHADD TAYLOR, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of Palo Alto, California, for all defendants-appellees. Of counsel was INDRA NEEL CHATTERJEE, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, for defendant-appellee, Nvida Corporation.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 8, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Biax Corporation v. Nvidia Corporation, No. 12-1387 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 8, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-12-01387-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-12-01387-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.