Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

SpeedTrack, Inc. v. Walmart.com USA, LLC, No. 12-1319 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 16, 2013)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1319
Decided
April 16, 2013
Judge
Document
Errata
Length
1 page

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

April 22, 2013 ERRATA

Appeal No. 2012-1319,-1402 SPEEDTRACK, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ENDECA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., AND

WALMART.COM USA, LLC, Defendants-Cross-Appellants. Decided: April 16, 2013 Nonprecedential Opinion

Please make the following change: Page 1, add docket number “2012-1402”

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

SpeedTrack, Inc. v. Walmart.com USA, LLC, No. 12-1319 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 16, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-12-01319-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-12-01319-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.