Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Boston Scientific Corporation v. Cordis Corporation, No. 12-1316 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 12, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1316
Decided
February 12, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION AND

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

CORDIS CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant.

2012-1316

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 10-CV-0315, Judge Sue L. Robinson.

JUDGMENT

YOUNG J. PARK, Fish & Richardson, P.C., of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellees.

GREGORY L. DISKANT, Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was EUGENE M. GELERNTER.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 12, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Boston Scientific Corporation v. Cordis Corporation, No. 12-1316 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 12, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-12-01316-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-12-01316-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.