Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Allergan, Inc. v. Watson Laboratories, Inc., No. 12-1310 (Fed. Cir. June 18, 2012)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1310
Decided
June 18, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Wniteb $>tates (!Court of ~ppeaIs

for tbe jfeberaI (!Circuit

ALLERGAN, INC., ALLERGAN USA, INC.,

ALLERGAN SALES, LLC, ENDO

PHARMACEUTICALS SOLUTIONS, INC., and SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. - FLORIDA,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

SANDOZ, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

PADDOCK LABORATORIES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2012-1310

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 09-CV-0511, Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet.

JUDGMENT

2Juanita R. Brooks, Fish & Richardson P.C., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With her on the brief were Jonathan E. Singer, of Minneapolis, Minnesota; and W. Chad Shear, of Wilmington, Delaware.

Charles A. Weiss, Kenyon & Kenyon, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellee, Watson Laboratories, Inc. - Florida. With him on the brief were Cynthia Lambert Hardman; and John W. Bateman, of Washington, DC.

Brian M. Kramer, Morrison & Foerster, LLP, of San Diego, California, argued for defendant-appellee, Sandoz, Inc. With him on the brief were David C. Doyle and Anders T. Aannestad; and Deanne E. Maynard of Washington, DC,

Wendy M. Ward, Merchant & Gould, P.C., of Madison, Wisconsin, argued for defendant-appellee, Paddock Laboratories, Inc. With her on the brief were Jeffrey S. Ward and Shane A. Brunner; and Rachel K. Zimmerman, of Minneapolis, Minnesota.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Figure on page 1 of the opinion
Figure on page 2 of the opinion

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 18,2012

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Allergan, Inc. v. Watson Laboratories, Inc., No. 12-1310 (Fed. Cir. June 18, 2012).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-12-01310-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-12-01310-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.