Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

D. Keith Heflin v. Coleman Music, No. 12-1287 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2012)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1287
Decided
December 10, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Wniteb ~tate5 ([ourt of ~ppeaI5

for tbe jfeberaI ([ircuit

D. KEITH HEFLIN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

COLEMAN MUSIC AND ENTERTAINMENT, LLC

and GARY B. COLEMAN, JR.,

Defendants-Appellees.

2012-1287

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Noo 10-CV-0566, Judge Robert Go Doumar.

JUDGMENT

JOHN Fo TRIGGS, Waddey & Patterson, PoC., of Nashville, Tennessee, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were MARK J. PATTERSON and PAUL NEY. Of counsel on the brief was JOHN B. MUMFORD, JR., Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, Po C., of Glen Allen, Virginia.

2ELIZABETH G. BORLAND, Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for defendants appellees. With her on the brief was DALE LISCHER.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Figure on page 1 of the opinion
Figure on page 2 of the opinion

Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT ~!d3

December 10, 2012

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

FILED u.s.

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT DEC 10 ZU1Z JAN HORBALY

CLERK

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

D. Keith Heflin v. Coleman Music, No. 12-1287 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2012).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-12-01287-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-12-01287-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.