Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Winegard Company v. Electronic Controlled Systems, No. 12-1282 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 16, 2012)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1282
Decided
November 16, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. mutteb ~tate5 QCourt of ~ppeaI5

for tbe jfeberaI QCtrcutt

WINEGARD COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ELECTRONIC CONTROLLED SYSTEMS, INC.

(doing business as King Controls),

Defendant-Appellant.

2012-1282

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa in case no. 09-CV-0138, Senior Judge Charles R. Wolle.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT V.P. WATERMAN, JR., Lane & Waterman LLP, of Davenport, Iowa, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was APRIL A. MARSHALL.

RANDALL T. SKAAR, Skaar Ulbrich Macari, P.A., of Minnetonka, Minnesota, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was SCOTT G. ULBRICH.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Figure on page 1 of the opinion
Figure on page 2 of the opinion

PER CURIAM (DYK, PLAGER, and REYNA, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT NOV 1 62012

Date

fiLED u.s.

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FFn!="RtII ~'Ii'r.I."T NOV ·10 ZUll JAN HORBALY

CLERK

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Winegard Company v. Electronic Controlled Systems, No. 12-1282 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 16, 2012).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-12-01282-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-12-01282-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error