Apeldyn Corporation v. AU Optronics Corporation, No. 12-1172 (Fed. Cir. July 17, 2013)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

APELDYN CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND AU

OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA,

Defendants-Appellees,

AND

CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION

AND CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA INC.,

Defendants-Appellees,

AND

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants.

2012-1172, -1173

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 08-CV-0568, Judge Sue L. Robinson.

JUDGMENT

2SCOTT G. SEIDMAN, Tonkon, Torp, Galen, Marmaduke & Booth, of Portland, Oregon argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were JON P. STRIDE and DON H. MARMADUKE.

LAWRENCE J. GOTTS, Latham & Watkins LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees AU Optronics Corporation, et al. With him on the brief was ELIZABETH M. ROESEL. Of counsel on the brief were TERRY D. GARNETT, VINCENT K. YIP, PETER J. WIED and JAY C. CHIU, Goodwin Procter LLP, of Los Angeles, California.

DONALD R. MCPHAIL, Cozen O’Connor, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, et al. With him on the brief was BARRY GOLOB. Of counsel was KRISTINA CAGGIANO, Duane Morris, LLP, of Washington, DC.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: