Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

U.S. Rubber Recycling, Inc. v. Ecore International, Inc., No. 12-1166 (Fed. Cir. May 8, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1166
Decided
May 8, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit U.S. RUBBER RECYCLING, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ECORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2012-1166

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 09-CV-9516, Judge James S. Otero.

JUDGMENT

THOMAS A. VOGELE, Thomas Vogele & Associates, APC, of Costa Mesa, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was TIMOTHY M. KOWAL. Of counsel were YURI MIKULKA and DOUGLAS Q. HAHN, Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, of Newport Beach, California.

ROBERT C. NISSEN, McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With

2him on the brief was JEFFREY D. WEXLER. Of counsel was WILLIAM T. ENOS.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 8, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

U.S. Rubber Recycling, Inc. v. Ecore International, Inc., No. 12-1166 (Fed. Cir. May 8, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-12-01166-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-12-01166-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.