Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Valeant International v. actavis, Inc., No. 12-1117 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 16, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1117
Decided
October 16, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit VALEANT INTERNATIONAL BERMUDA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ACTAVIS, INC., WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. -

FLORIDA, AND ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants.

2012-1117, -1307

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in No. 10-CV-20526.

JUDGMENT

THERESA M. GILLIS, Mayer Brown LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With her on the brief were JOHN J. MOLENDA. Of counsel on the brief were THOMAS W. JENKINS and ERICK J. PALMER, of Chicago, Illinois.

JEFFREY J. TONEY, Kasowitz, Benson Torres & Friedman LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief were JONATHAN K. WALDROP and DARCEY L. JONES. Of counsel on the brief

2was NORMAN E.B. MINNEAR, of New York, New York. Of counsel was PARKER C. ANKRUM, of Redwood, California. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 16, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Valeant International v. actavis, Inc., No. 12-1117 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 16, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-12-01117-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-12-01117-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.