Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Convolve, Inc. v. Compaq Computer Corporation, No. 12-1074 (Fed. Cir. July 1, 2013)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1074
Decided
July 1, 2013
Judge
Document
Errata
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

July 2, 2013

ERRATA

Appeal No. 2012-1074

CONVOLVE, INC. AND

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee,

AND

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC AND SEAGATE

TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees. Decided: July 1, 2013

Nonprecedential Opinion

Please make the following change:

“CHRISTOPHER D. LANDGRAFF, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was MARK E. FERGUSON. Of counsel was VINCENT BUCCOLA, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, of Chicago, Illinois; CARTER G. PHILLIPS and ROBERT N. HOCHMAN, Sidley Austin LLP, of Washington, DC; NATALIA V.2 BLINKOVA and BLAIR M. JACOBS, McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, of Washington, DC.” to

“CHRISTOPHER D. LANDGRAFF, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee Compaq Computer Corporation. With him on the brief was MARK E. FERGUSON.

CARTER G. PHILLIPS, Sidley Austin LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees Seagate Technology, LLC, et al. With him on the brief was ROBERT N. HOCHMAN. Of counsel on the brief were NATALIA V. BLINKOVA and BLAIR M. JACOBS, McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, of Washington, DC.”

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Convolve, Inc. v. Compaq Computer Corporation, No. 12-1074 (Fed. Cir. July 1, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-12-01074-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-12-01074-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.