Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 12-1042 (Fed. Cir. June 25, 2013)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1042
Decided
June 25, 2013
Judge
Document
Errata
Length
1 page

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

June 25, 2013

ERRATA

Appeal No. 2012-1042 COMMIL USA, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Decided: June 25, 2013

Precedential Opinion

The following changes have been made to the concurring-in-part, dissenting-in-part opinion filed by Circuit Judge O’MALLEY in the opinion released June 25, 2013:

Page 9, line 35, “We unanimously” is changed to “Judge Prost and I”.

Page 10, line 5, “the majority concludes” is changed to “Judges Prost and Newman conclude”.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 12-1042 (Fed. Cir. June 25, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-12-01042-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-12-01042-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.