Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Alexander Orenshteyn v. Citrix Systems, Inc., No. 11-1308 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 11-1308
Decided
April 11, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ALEXANDER S. ORENSHTEYN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2011-1308

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in No. 02-CV-60478, Judge Adalberto Jordan.

JUDGMENT

JOSEPH J. ZITO, Zito, tlp, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was EMERSON V. BRIGGS, III.

DOUGLAS J. KLINE, Goodwin Procter, LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were WILLIAM A. MEUNIER; TIMOTHY J. ROUSSEAU, of New York, New York.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 11, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Alexander Orenshteyn v. Citrix Systems, Inc., No. 11-1308 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-11-01308-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-11-01308-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.