Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Weekly Digestmlniteb <!Court of
~tates ~ppeals for tbe jfe beral <!Circuit
v.
Please make the following change: Page 13, line 20 of Judge Dyk's dissent-in-part, change "matter statutory interpretation" to --matter of statutory interpretation--.
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.
Marine Polymer Technologies v. HemCon, Inc., No. 10-1548 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 15, 2012).
No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error