Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Priceplay, Inc. v. Google Inc., No. 10-1306 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 11, 2011)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1306
Decided
February 11, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit PRICEPLAY, INC. (FORMERLY PERFORMANCE

PRICING, INC.),

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

GOOGLE, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

AOL, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

2010-1306

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 07-CV-0432, Chief Judge Randall R. Rader, sitting by designation.

JUDGMENT

RICHARD E. LYON, III, Dovel & Luner, LLP, of Santa Monica, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was GREGORY S. DOVEL.

2DAVID A. PERLSON, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for defendant-appellee Google, Inc. With him on the brief were CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN, EMILY C. O’BRIEN and ANTONIO R. SISTOS.

ROBERT L. BURNS, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, of Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee AOL, LLC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 11, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Priceplay, Inc. v. Google Inc., No. 10-1306 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 11, 2011).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-10-01306-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-10-01306-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.