Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc., No. 09-1372 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 31, 2012)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1372
Also Docketed
No. 09-1380, No. 09-1416, No. 09-1417, No. 10-1291 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
August 31, 2012
Judge
Document
Errata
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

September 6, 2012

ERRATA

Appeal Nos. 2009-1372, -1380, -1416, -1417 AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

AND

THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF

TECHNOLOGY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant.

AND

Appeal No. 2010-1291

MCKESSON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (formerly McKesson Information Solutions, LLC),

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

22 AKAMAI v. LIMELIGHT & MCKESSON v. EPIC

EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

Decided: August 31, 2012

Precedential Opinion

Please make the following changes: Page 21, line 12 of Judge Newman’s dissent, change “Maj. op. 22–23 n.4” to --Maj. op. 22 n.4--. Page 30, line 24 of Judge Newman’s dissent, change “maj. op. 26–27” to --maj. op. 26--. Page 9, line 14 of Judge Linn’s dissent, change “Maj. Op. 30-31” to --Maj. Op. 30--. Page 13, line 18 of Judge Linn’s dissent, change “Maj. Op. 27” to --Maj. Op. 26-27--.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc., No. 09-1372 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 31, 2012).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-09-01372-2
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-09-01372-2

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.